{
  "id": 8652055,
  "name": "NICHOLAS JENKINS v. JOHN H. JONES",
  "name_abbreviation": "Jenkins v. Jones",
  "decision_date": "1911-05-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "228",
  "last_page": "229",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "155 N.C. 228"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 60,
    "char_count": 475,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.449,
    "sha256": "7a3c23e38fc9326907fe3dc3bff2fb26417e99e2fdccc29701f51ee59d3dd48a",
    "simhash": "1:6e3f7e071ed40512",
    "word_count": 77
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:21:07.457528+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "NICHOLAS JENKINS v. JOHN H. JONES."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Curiam:.\n\"Without approving tbe construction placed upon tbe deeds by tbe court below, we are of opinion that there is no error of which the plaintiff (appellant) can complain, and the judgment is therefore\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Curiam:."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Marie Squires and Lawrence Wakefield for plaintiff.",
      "Edmund Jones for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "NICHOLAS JENKINS v. JOHN H. JONES.\n(Filed 11 May, 1911.)\nAppeal and Error.\nIn this case no reversible error is found.\nAppeal from Cline, J., from Caldwell, January 13, 1911.\nMarie Squires and Lawrence Wakefield for plaintiff.\nEdmund Jones for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0228-01",
  "first_page_order": 264,
  "last_page_order": 265
}
