{
  "id": 11270110,
  "name": "N. R. DEPPE v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Deppe v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad",
  "decision_date": "1911-09-27",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "56",
  "last_page": "56",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "156 N.C. 56"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "154 N. C., 523",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8652826
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/154/0523-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "152 N. C., 79",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11269672
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/152/0079-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 130,
    "char_count": 1131,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.411,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.23911973246316678
    },
    "sha256": "164b5e8fad565aee422dc1fed3c9fa118e039c6f6578625826de4708c99f89ae",
    "simhash": "1:bb897b6d3a922a9e",
    "word_count": 199
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:09:22.906707+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "N. R. DEPPE v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Olabk, C. J.\nThis case was before us, 152 N. C., 79-83, where the facts are fully set out-, and again, 154 N. C., 523.\nOn this last trial the case was tried in accordance with the principles of law laid down in the two former appeals. The evidence was substantially the same as on the former trials, with the addition of other witnesses, whose evidence was largely cumulative.\nNumerous exceptions were taken, but we do not think that discussion of. them is necessary. The learned and impartial judge ruled out much of the plaintiff's testimony and evidently labored to bring the case strictly within the former decisions of this Court in this case. We think he has done so, at least to the extent that no substantial error has been committed which entitles the defendant to still another trial of the case before a jury.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Olabk, C. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "D. L. Ward1, D. B. Henderson, B. M. Oreen, and Rodman Gui\u00f3n for plaintiff.",
      "Moore & Dunn for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "N. R. DEPPE v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY.\n(Filed 27 September, 1911.)\nIn this case no substantial error was found.\nAppeal by defendant from Ferguson, J., at April Term, 1911, of ObaveN.\nD. L. Ward1, D. B. Henderson, B. M. Oreen, and Rodman Gui\u00f3n for plaintiff.\nMoore & Dunn for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0056-01",
  "first_page_order": 96,
  "last_page_order": 96
}