{
  "id": 11272242,
  "name": "R. O. JEFFRESS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Jeffress v. Norfolk Southern Railroad",
  "decision_date": "1911-10-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "589",
  "last_page": "589",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "156 N.C. 589"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 57,
    "char_count": 443,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.479,
    "sha256": "437e1fe2882c6f6c4145e8b9af783b0694e2e1b8182da0857282ca4886f39951",
    "simhash": "1:4617e637c27e6f1a",
    "word_count": 73
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:09:22.906707+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "R. O. JEFFRESS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cubiam.\nWe have examined the several assignments of error and'the record in this appeal. -The only issue related to the question of damage, and we find no error in the record which in our opinion necessitates another trial.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cubiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Harry Sleirmer for plaintiff.",
      "Moore & Long for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "R. O. JEFFRESS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY.\n(Filed 4 October, 1911.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Ferguson, J., at March Term, 1911, of Pitt.\nHarry Sleirmer for plaintiff.\nMoore & Long for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0589-01",
  "first_page_order": 629,
  "last_page_order": 629
}