{
  "id": 11272271,
  "name": "J. E. RICHARDSON v. T. M. EDWARDS et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Richardson v. Edwards",
  "decision_date": "1911-11-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "590",
  "last_page": "591",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "156 N.C. 590"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 134,
    "char_count": 1523,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.448,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.6028531754986583e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6841775331303099
    },
    "sha256": "e9ad1fdb667889fbd3dfa921e3e4162abc2bb4bb830b4f51afaed02de4be273e",
    "simhash": "1:df9ec5e36715034b",
    "word_count": 254
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:09:22.906707+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "J. E. RICHARDSON v. T. M. EDWARDS et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Oubiam.\nThe form of the second issue is defective. The record shows that his Honor instructed the jury to consider the issue as if it read, \u201cDid the plaintiff contribute by his own negligence to his injury?\u201d which is the usual and approved form. We think the error was fully cured.\nWe have examined the other assignments of error, all of which relate to the charge of the court, and find them to be without substantial merit.\nThe case was fairly put to the jury in accord with the well-settled decisions of this Court.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Oubiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Stack & Parker for plaintiff.",
      "Redwine & Sikes, Adams, Armfield & Adams for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "J. E. RICHARDSON v. T. M. EDWARDS et al.\n(Filed 1 November, 1911.)\nNegligence \u2014 Contributory Negligence \u2014 Issues\u2014Instructions\u2014Harmless Error.\nIn an action for damages for personal injuries received, tbe first issue being upon tbe question of defendant\u2019s negligence causing tbe injury, tbe second issue read, \u201cIf so, did plaintiff! contribute to bis injury?\u201d Hclci, the error in the second issue was cured under an instruction that the jury should consider the issue as if it had read, \u201cDid tbe plaintiff contribute by his own negligence to his injury?\u201d\nAppeal by plaintiff from 0. II. Allen, J., at February Term, 1911, of UNION.\nThese issues were submitted:\n1. Was tbe plaintiff injured by the negligence of tbe defendant ? Answer: Yes.\n2. If so, did the plaintiff contribute to bis injury? Answer: Tes.\n3. What damage, if any, did plaintiff sustain?\nFrom the-judgment rendered the plaintiff appealed.\nStack & Parker for plaintiff.\nRedwine & Sikes, Adams, Armfield & Adams for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0590-01",
  "first_page_order": 630,
  "last_page_order": 631
}