{
  "id": 8656654,
  "name": "W. T. SPRINKLE v. J. H. SPRINKLE",
  "name_abbreviation": "Sprinkle v. Sprinkle",
  "decision_date": "1912-04-24",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "84",
  "last_page": "84",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "159 N.C. 84"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 65,
    "char_count": 552,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.481,
    "sha256": "b696993adc22783aab17a63a5a8d64d54e19e5b006177bbbf5b87ce722bff009",
    "simhash": "1:e81b3a2a885413cb",
    "word_count": 92
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:13:45.962633+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "W. T. SPRINKLE v. J. H. SPRINKLE."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Allen, J.\nThe judgment of the Superior Court was in favor of the defendant, and he appeals from an adverse ruling in the admission of evidence, which it is not necessary for us to consider, as the judgment is affirmed on the plaintiff\u2019s appeal.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Allen, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Jones & Patterson for plaintiff.",
      "Manly, ILendren & Womble for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "W. T. SPRINKLE v. J. H. SPRINKLE.\n(Filed 24 April, 1912.)\nEvidence excepted to not considered, as new trial is granted in plain-1 tiff\u2019s appeal.\nAppeal by defendant from Lyon, J., at December Term, 1911, of FoRsrTH.\nJones & Patterson for plaintiff.\nManly, ILendren & Womble for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0084-01",
  "first_page_order": 132,
  "last_page_order": 132
}