{
  "id": 8659256,
  "name": "D. J. RICHARDS v. RITTER LUMBER COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Richards v. Ritter Lumber Co.",
  "decision_date": "1912-05-28",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "455",
  "last_page": "455",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "159 N.C. 455"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 57,
    "char_count": 528,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.456,
    "sha256": "0f1760c7723f27fcc0554313ac593e9197a66847d84e17867084d4432619ac9c",
    "simhash": "1:43c0c13a3118a43a",
    "word_count": 84
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:13:45.962633+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "D. J. RICHARDS v. RITTER LUMBER COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nUpon consideration of tbe opinion and judgment at last term, tbe Court is of opinion, as alleged in tbe petition to rehear, tbat .tbe conclusion and judgment at last term should be reformed by striking out tbe judgment, \u201cDefendant\u2019s appeal dismissed,\u201d and substituting in lieu thereof,after tbe word \u201crecord,\u201d tbe words \u201cIn both appeals, New Trial,\u201d as prayed in tbe petition to rehear.\nJudgment reformed accordingly.-",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "D. J. RICHARDS v. RITTER LUMBER COMPANY.\n(Filed 28 May, 1912.)\nModified upon\u2019petition to rehear."
  },
  "file_name": "0455-01",
  "first_page_order": 505,
  "last_page_order": 505
}