{
  "id": 11276062,
  "name": "William Davidson v. Thomas L. Cowan",
  "name_abbreviation": "Davidson v. Cowan",
  "decision_date": "1830-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "470",
  "last_page": "471",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "1 Dev. Eq. 470"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "16 N.C. 470"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 264,
    "char_count": 3060,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.272,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 3.633999973422247e-07,
      "percentile": 0.889276170155094
    },
    "sha256": "6bc48a34d5f82175211332893376805ca00e6ab930ce47c9604c6394ba2f254e",
    "simhash": "1:46acc06a8a7c0c5e",
    "word_count": 529
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:48:17.309620+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William Davidson v. Thomas L. Cowan,"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Ruffin, Judge.\n\u2014 This cause might weli be decided upon its particular circumstances j since the agreement of the. parties, mentioned in the pleadings, would con \u2022 cludethem, and the judgment at Law is upon that, agree\u201d ment.\nBut it may be serviceable (o the profession and the community generally, for tlie Court at once to declare the hnv upon the general question made | as the whole Court has a clear opinion on it.\nThat question is? whether a notice of an unregistered mcr\u00edgag.' or deed of trust, acquired by a creditor by judgment of the mortgagor, before a sale on his execution, a Scots the creditor, and sets up the deed. And we think oat. Thereis.no equity against a creditor, restraining him from using all legal \u00abMeans tc obtain a preference, and ultimate satisfaction of his deists The period of contracting the debt is wholly immaterial. One creditor may justly obtain satisfaction, although he knows that he thereby deprives his debtor of the means of paying a debt previously contracted. Nothing but the actual divesting of the debtor\u2019s estate, or a specific valid Ken on it at Law, can defeat a creditor. If he obtains his execution before art eider debt is ripened into judgment, he may satisfy himself. If he gets the. lega? preference by his execution, hel\u00f3te a credit.!\u00bb\u00bb1 by \u00ab.mortgage perfects his title by registration, he may likewise, satisfy him-self, Each hits an equal equity, and one has the law. He may keep it. The case of a purchaser is entirely different. fie has no equity, if he buys \\\\ hat he knows another cannot rightfully sell. lie claims under the mortgagor, by ip-contract male in fraud of another. Be is not obliged to lay out his money, and does it at a risk. 31 creditor claims against both moidga--fc-gor atid mortgagee, amkf&rsceking, not to deprive another ol'Uis rights,-hut to save\u2019'himself.. In such :i storm, ho who can lay hoTcHi\u00ed aplank, by getting the advantage at Law; shall not lie deprived of it. As' against a creditor, the deed is tib\u00ed valid until registration ; and if it he not registered befdre the ieste of the creditor\u2019s execution, it does not stand in bis way.\nPer Curiam.\nLet the- bill be dismissed with costs.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Ruffin, Judge. Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Gaston, for the Plaintiff.",
      "Mash, with whom was Badger, for the Defendant"
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William Davidson v. Thomas L. Cowan,\nFrom Mecklenburg.\nA judgment creditor is not affected by notice of a prior unregistered moitgage, and is, in this respect, .distinguished from the vendee of the mortgagor himself. Therefore, the Court will not enjoin such creditor from selling the mortgaged premises, under his execution.\nThe facts stated in the bill and answer were the same, as those reported in the cause at Law between the same parties (2 vol. Law Cases, p. 533). The bill prayed an injunction against an execution, issuing on that judgment, upon the ground, that at the time the Defendant recovered his judgment, as well as when the negroes of McCulloch, mortgaged to the Plaintiff, were seized under the first execution, the Defendant had notice of the mortgage, although it was not then registered.\nGaston, for the Plaintiff.\nMash, with whom was Badger, for the Defendant"
  },
  "file_name": "0470-01",
  "first_page_order": 480,
  "last_page_order": 481
}