{
  "id": 11270027,
  "name": "W. S. CHADWICK v. NORFOLK-SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et als.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Chadwick v. Norfolk-Southern Railway Co.",
  "decision_date": "1912-09-25",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "209",
  "last_page": "210",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "161 N.C. 209"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 125,
    "char_count": 1617,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.454,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.7354383275096434e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3593051177887205
    },
    "sha256": "8b4b2ef938b50a1bcf2f7ece6101385326e63c972adf64913b035139dc5a829b",
    "simhash": "1:032929f9117518a4",
    "word_count": 274
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:55:28.078438+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "W. S. CHADWICK v. NORFOLK-SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et als."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee. Curiam.\nThe plaintiff moves to dismiss this appeal in this Court upon the ground that the same is premature. The clerk of the Superior Court dismissed the proceedings.\nUpon appeal at chambers,, the judge presiding in tbe Third Judicial District reversed the. judgment of the clerk and remanded the same to him, to the end that the proper order be made of survey, etc., in accordance with the statute. Revisal, 326.\nWe are of opinion that the motion to dismiss this appeal because it is premature should be allowed. It was the duty of the defendant to have noted every exception and let the cause proceed to the hearing under the statute, and then, if dissatisfied with the final result, upon exceptions properly taken, the cause can be heard in the Superior Court, and thence by appeal to this Court.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee. Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Gui\u00f3n & Gui\u00f3n for plaintiff.",
      "E. H. Gorham, G. R. Thomas', J. F. Duncan for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "W. S. CHADWICK v. NORFOLK-SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et als.\n(Filed 25 September, 1912.)\nAppeal and Error \u2014 Processioning Lands \u2014 Fragmentary Appeal \u2014 Order Remanding Cause to Clerk \u2014 Practice.\nAn appeal from tlie order of the Superior Court judge reversing the judgment of the clerk of the court and remanding the cause to hiim to the end! that the proper order for a survey be made in proceedings to procession lands, under Revisal, sec. 326, is premature, and a motion to dismiss should be allowed; exceptions should have been taken to the order and the final result appealed from.\nAppeal from an order of Foushee, J., heard at chambers, 11 March, 1912, from Cabteret.\nThis is a processioning proceeding.\nGui\u00f3n & Gui\u00f3n for plaintiff.\nE. H. Gorham, G. R. Thomas', J. F. Duncan for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0209-01",
  "first_page_order": 253,
  "last_page_order": 254
}