{
  "id": 11270106,
  "name": "M. D. McCALL v. J. T. SUSTAIR et als.",
  "name_abbreviation": "McCall v. Sustair",
  "decision_date": "1912-12-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "213",
  "last_page": "213",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "161 N.C. 213"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "157 N. C., 179",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8656840
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/157/0179-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 90,
    "char_count": 895,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.494,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.239119539401718
    },
    "sha256": "be45f384899f0c28b16af063159b3c8e1b7905a9b987042bae7cc3a0ab2f7eb4",
    "simhash": "1:0ca6c18b1334269b",
    "word_count": 156
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:55:28.078438+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Walker, J., and IIoke, J., dissenting."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "M. D. McCALL v. J. T. SUSTAIR et als."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:.\nWe have considered carefully the petition to rehear in this case and the briefs filed by the learned counsel for the plaintiff in support of it, as well as those filed by the defendant.\nThe majority of the Court is of opinion that no authority was overlooked in the opinion of the Chief Justice and that no question has been raised by the petition to rehear which was not considered on the former hearing.\nWe are of opinion that the ease was fully covered by the opinion of the Chief Justice, affirming the judgment of his Honor, Judge Biggs.\nThe petition to rehear is dismissed.\nWalker, J., and IIoke, J., dissenting.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Burwell & Camsler, B. S. Hutchison, and McCall & Smith for plaintiff. ,",
      "Stewart & McRae and Maxwell & Keerans for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "M. D. McCALL v. J. T. SUSTAIR et als.\n(Filed 11 December, 1912.)\nPetition- to rehear this cause by plaintiff, reported in 157 N. C., 179.\nBurwell & Camsler, B. S. Hutchison, and McCall & Smith for plaintiff. ,\nStewart & McRae and Maxwell & Keerans for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0213-01",
  "first_page_order": 257,
  "last_page_order": 257
}