{
  "id": 11270153,
  "name": "MARY QUEEN, Administratrix, v. SNOWBIRD VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Queen v. Snowbird Valley Railroad",
  "decision_date": "1912-12-14",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "217",
  "last_page": "217",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "161 N.C. 217"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "148 N. C., 51",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "131 N. C., 163",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8659591
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/131/0163-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 137,
    "char_count": 1561,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.507,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.770845263994211e-08,
      "percentile": 0.41471993154813275
    },
    "sha256": "31400595bfde72f9570bc699f406b787aaf2a826bd1008a7dd7c4345a0f379d0",
    "simhash": "1:b20209245de00060",
    "word_count": 279
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:55:28.078438+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MARY QUEEN, Administratrix, v. SNOWBIRD VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis is an appeal from a nonsuit. The defendant\u2019s motion to dismiss because there is no assignment of error cannot be allowed, because the appeal from the judgment is of itself an assignment of error. Wilson v. Lumber Co., 131 N. C., 163, and cases there cited; Mershon v. Morris, 148 N. C., 51.\nBut there is no case on appeal settled by the judge or by counsel. The evidence in the shape of question and answer is dumped into the record, and there is nothing to show that it is correct. Besides, while there is leave to sue as a pauper, there is no leave to appeal as a pauper, no appeal bond, and no printed record nor any printed brief on behalf of the plaintiff.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. N. Moody, A. D. Baby, for plaintiff.",
      "Dillard & Hill, M. W. Bell, Mor phew & Phillips for defendr ant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MARY QUEEN, Administratrix, v. SNOWBIRD VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY.\n(Filed 14 December, 1912.)\n1. Appeal and Error \u2014 Appeal from Judgment \u2014 Assignment of Error \u2014Motions.\nAn appeal from tlie judgment rendered is of itself an assignment of error, and the case on appeal will not on motion be dismissed on the ground that no error was therein assigned by appellant.\n2. Appeal and Error \u2014 in Forma Pauperis \u2014 Leave to Appeal \u2014 Practice.\nTo appeal as a pauper, the statutory leave must be obtained, and the mere leave to sue as a. pauper is not sufficient.\n3. Appeal and Error \u2014 Case\u2014Settlement by Judge \u2014 Practice.\nIt is necessary that thlS trial judge settle the case on appeal when the parties do not agree.\nAppeal from Webb, J., at Special Term, 1912, of Graham.\nJ. N. Moody, A. D. Baby, for plaintiff.\nDillard & Hill, M. W. Bell, Mor phew & Phillips for defendr ant."
  },
  "file_name": "0217-01",
  "first_page_order": 261,
  "last_page_order": 261
}