{
  "id": 11270329,
  "name": "STATE v. J. E. SAVAGE",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Savage",
  "decision_date": "1912-11-13",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "245",
  "last_page": "246",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "161 N.C. 245"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "113 N. C., 646",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 121,
    "char_count": 1500,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.467,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.553285487460147e-08,
      "percentile": 0.40174060340969686
    },
    "sha256": "184484666b6ecb3100b5eb8318afecb9199b97e6684d72e2e3824509bb8ac100",
    "simhash": "1:ce2391db1e68bea3",
    "word_count": 253
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:55:28.078438+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. J. E. SAVAGE."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PeR Cueiam.\nThe judgment, upon the verdict of the jury, is fully authorized by Revisal, sec. 3269, which reads as follows :\n\u201cUpon the trial of any indictment the prisoner may be convicted of the crime charged therein or of a less degree of the same crime, or of an attempt to commit a less degree of the same crime.\u201d\nThis statute was discussed in S. v. Brown, 113 N. C., 646, and construed in accordance with the ruling of his Honor.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PeR Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General Bickett and, Assistant Attorney-General Calvert for the State.",
      "II. 0. Sapp and, Jones & Patterson for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. J. E. SAVAGE.\n(Filed 13 November, 1912.)\nVerdict \u2014 Judgments\u2014Motions in Arrest \u2014 Interpretation of Statutes.\nUpon a verdict finding that the defendant was \u201cguilty of an attempt to commit the crime charged in the bill of indictment,\u201d the offense being that prohibited by Revisal, sec. 3349, the judgment upon the verdict may not be arrested on defendant\u2019s motion. Revisal, 3269.\nAppeal by defendant from 0. II. Allen, J., at July Term, 1912, of Fobsyth.\n\u2022 The defendant was charged in the indictment with the violation of section 3349 of the Revisal, which denounces the crime against nature, and the jury returned as their verdict: \u201cGuilty of an attempt to commit the crime charged in the bill of indictment.\u201d\nUpon this verdict, the defendant was sentenced to four months in jail and assigned to work on the public roads.\nThe defendant moved in arrest of judgment, which motion was overruled, and defendant appealed.\nAttorney-General Bickett and, Assistant Attorney-General Calvert for the State.\nII. 0. Sapp and, Jones & Patterson for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0245-01",
  "first_page_order": 289,
  "last_page_order": 290
}