{
  "id": 11271906,
  "name": "W. R. HOPKINS et al. v. J. M. CRISP et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hopkins v. Crisp",
  "decision_date": "1913-05-28",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "528",
  "last_page": "528",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "162 N.C. 528"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 105,
    "char_count": 885,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.442,
    "sha256": "1a71830d8ff1b19ce230cb10d2389b35260464b3af9afb6923cc95405861c502",
    "simhash": "1:48cec416ebfc3c3e",
    "word_count": 153
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:55:37.824965+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "W. R. HOPKINS et al. v. J. M. CRISP et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nWe have examined the record in this case and considered the several assignments of error, and we find no reversible error. The controversy appears to he 'almost exclusively one of fact, and we think the court properly presented it to the jury-\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "M. W. Bell, J. H. Dillard, and Zeiulon Weaver for plaintiffs.",
      "A. D. Baby, J. N. Moody, and B. L. Phillips 'for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "W. R. HOPKINS et al. v. J. M. CRISP et al.\n(Filed 28 May, 1913.)\nEvidence \u2014 Issues of Fact \u2014 Questions for Jury.\nThis cause presenting a controversy of fact properly presented to the jury; no error is found.\nAppeal bj plaintiff from Lane, J., at Spring Term, 1912, of CilEROKEE.\nCivil action tried upon this.issue:\n(1) 'Us tbe land claimed by plaintiffs, Tract No. 1949, located as shown on the plat, and as contended by plaintiffs ? Answer: Yes.\u201d\nFrom the judgment rendered, defendant appealed.\nM. W. Bell, J. H. Dillard, and Zeiulon Weaver for plaintiffs.\nA. D. Baby, J. N. Moody, and B. L. Phillips 'for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0528-01",
  "first_page_order": 572,
  "last_page_order": 572
}