{
  "id": 8658379,
  "name": "ABERDEEN AND ASHBORO RAILROAD COMPANY v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Aberdeen & Ashboro Railroad v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.",
  "decision_date": "1913-12-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "395",
  "last_page": "395",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "164 N.C. 395"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 82,
    "char_count": 772,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.43,
    "sha256": "b88b93efff7e9ab19e6a30a32f81b9546c68edf056a742ee92ed9f343981a196",
    "simhash": "1:945e2a28cb33c3fc",
    "word_count": 132
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:20:25.630766+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ABERDEEN AND ASHBORO RAILROAD COMPANY v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nTbis action was tried in accordance with tbe principles laid down in tbe former appeal, 157 N. 0., 369, and upon an examination of the entire record we find no reversible error.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Douglass & Douglass, Jerome & Price, B. L. Burns, and W. H. Lyon for plaintiff.",
      "W. LI. Neal for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ABERDEEN AND ASHBORO RAILROAD COMPANY v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY.\n(Filed 10 December, 1913.)\nTrials \u2014 Appeal and Error.\nTbis action was tried in accordance with the decision in the former appeal, and no reversible error is found.\nAppeal by defendant from Bragaw, J., at May Term, 1913, of Moore.\nTbis is an action to recover damages, and tbe facts are fully stated in the former appeal. There was a judgment for tbe plaintiff, and tbe defendant appealed.\nDouglass & Douglass, Jerome & Price, B. L. Burns, and W. H. Lyon for plaintiff.\nW. LI. Neal for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0395-01",
  "first_page_order": 431,
  "last_page_order": 431
}