{
  "id": 11269168,
  "name": "S. W. WHITE et al. v. MARY HARRIS",
  "name_abbreviation": "White v. Harris",
  "decision_date": "1914-05-06",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "227",
  "last_page": "228",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "166 N.C. 227"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "151 N. C., 602",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8655662
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/151/0602-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "151 N. C., 602",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8655662
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/151/0602-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 101,
    "char_count": 1032,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.486,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.23911104469797273
    },
    "sha256": "3526ba1e01e94c503ba47f2fc6f3f6044d7a82215e59217ec1af95a243dab9f7",
    "simhash": "1:5f041634f3498bbb",
    "word_count": 173
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:23:48.430184+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "S. W. WHITE et al. v. MARY HARRIS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Curiam.\nTbe appeal must be dismissed upon tbe authority of Teeter v. Mfg. Co., 151 N. C., 602, and tbe cases there cited.\nIf parties were allowed to appeal whenever dissatisfied with a ruling upon evidence, tbe trial of tbe cause upon its merits could be indefinitely postponed.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "T. W. Alexander for plaintiff.",
      "No counsel for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "S. W. WHITE et al. v. MARY HARRIS.\n(Filed 6 May, 1914.)\nAppeal and Error \u2014 Nonsuit\u2014Trials\u2014Evidence\u2014Fragmentary Appeal.\nAn appeal from a judgment of nonsuit taken upon the ruling of the trial court upon admissibility of evidence not determinative of the controversy will not be considered. Tester v. Mfg. Go., 151 N. C., 602, cited as controlling.\nAppeal by plaintiff from Harding, J., at November Term, 1913, of 1\u00cdECKLENB\u00daRG.\nTbis is an action to bare a trust declared, and to recover a lot of land.\nUpon an adverse ruling as to tbe admissibility of certain evidence, not necessarily determinative of tbe action, tbe plaintiff submitted to judgment of nons\u00fait and appealed.\nT. W. Alexander for plaintiff.\nNo counsel for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0227-02",
  "first_page_order": 269,
  "last_page_order": 270
}