{
  "id": 11269181,
  "name": "IDA LATTA v. CHARLES U. NICHOLS",
  "name_abbreviation": "Latta v. Nichols",
  "decision_date": "1914-04-15",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "228",
  "last_page": "229",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "166 N.C. 228"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 103,
    "char_count": 1087,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.439,
    "sha256": "086510400cf8ab6d8a3086ce8c6bf8d7309e7daece78b7034376d357bb2aed6e",
    "simhash": "1:9ef246042554cdb7",
    "word_count": 184
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:23:48.430184+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "IDA LATTA v. CHARLES U. NICHOLS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Cueiam.\nWe bare examined, and considered tbe eight assignments of error set out in tbis record, and pressed upon our attention in tbe brief and argument of tbe learned counsel for tbe plaintiffs. Tbe controversy appears to be one largely of fact, and we think is determined witb substantial justice by tbe verdict of tbe jury.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "G. D. Turner for plaintiff.",
      "'S. M. Gottis for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IDA LATTA v. CHARLES U. NICHOLS.\n(Filed 15 April, 1914.)\nHeld, this controversy involved issues of fact, and there is no error.\nAppeal by plaintiff from Peebles, J., at May Term, 1913, of ORANGE.\nCivil action tried upon these issues:\n1. Is tbe defendant, Charles Nichols, indebted to tbe plaintiff, Ida Latta, and if so, in what amount? Answer: No.\n2. Is tbe plaintiff, Ida Latta, indebted to the defendant, Charles U. Nichols, and if so, in what amount? Answer: Yes; $55.29, with interest from 23 January, 1912.\n3. Is tbe defendant, Charles U. Nichols, indebted to tbe inter-pleader, Richard Latta, and if so, in what amount ? Answer: $20.\nFrom judgment rendered, tbe plaintiff appealed.\nG. D. Turner for plaintiff.\n'S. M. Gottis for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0228-01",
  "first_page_order": 270,
  "last_page_order": 271
}