{
  "id": 11269973,
  "name": "STATE v. LESTER MORRIS",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Morris",
  "decision_date": "1914-02-29",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "441",
  "last_page": "441",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "166 N.C. 441"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 139,
    "char_count": 1605,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.476,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.12982294956584e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3223881006189936
    },
    "sha256": "d1d12fb469d301974a4427990a1cddb0a1dfd6c9320756e7cee479b16ca736a3",
    "simhash": "1:498796267e2086a9",
    "word_count": 269
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:23:48.430184+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. LESTER MORRIS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe decision of this appeal is controlled by S. v. Nipper, ante, 272.\nThere was a difference of opinion among the members of the Court upon some of the questions raised in that case; but all agreed that guards 'have no right to whip the convicts in the absence of rules and regulations by the county commissioners, and none appear here.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General Bickett and Assistant Attorney-General Galvert for the State.",
      "Mangwm & Woltz for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. LESTER MORRIS.\n(Filed 29 February, 1914.)\nConvicts \u2014 Guards\u2014Right to Whip \u2014 County Commissioners \u2014 Rules and Regulations.\nIn tbe-absence of rules aud regulations made and promulgated by tbe county,commissioners permitting it; a guard bas no legal right or authorhy to whip convicts in bis care or custody. 8. v. Nipper, ante, 272, cited as controlling.\nxYppeal by defendant from. Adams, J'., at January Term, 1914, of GastoN.\nTbe defendant, a superintendent of one of tbe cbain-gangs in Gaston County, was convicted of whipping a convict.\nTbe whipping, with a leather strap l1/^ inches wide, 16 or 18 inches long, attached to a wooden handle 10 or 12 inches long, was admitted by the defendant, and the evidence for the State showed a serious beating and the use of a stick.\nThere were no written rules or regulations, and there is no evidence that the commissioners of Gaston County have formulated and adopted any rules or regulations for the discipline of convicts.\nHis Honor charged the jury that if they believed the evidence the defendant was guilty, and he excepted and appealed from the judgment imposing a fine of $10.\nAttorney-General Bickett and Assistant Attorney-General Galvert for the State.\nMangwm & Woltz for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0441-01",
  "first_page_order": 483,
  "last_page_order": 483
}