{
  "id": 11273179,
  "name": "JAMES H. PADGETT v. S. ANNIE McCOY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Padgett v. McCoy",
  "decision_date": "1914",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "508",
  "last_page": "508",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "167 N.C. 508"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 59,
    "char_count": 397,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.526,
    "sha256": "a70ae5907ac5c7fd80d701c8a283ef626fd6d89003b26cc14232e2bb239390b6",
    "simhash": "1:7ee952ea3ba702db",
    "word_count": 69
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:55:31.572596+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "JAMES H. PADGETT v. S. ANNIE McCOY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee CueiaM.\nTbe motion for a new trial in tbis case, because of newly discovered evidence, is denied. Tbe application is not witbin tbe rule applicable to sucb cases. Johnson v. R. R., 163 N. C., at page 453. Besides, it. is without real merit.\nMotion denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee CueiaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Marie W. Brown for plaintiff.",
      "Garland A. Thomasson, Zebulon Weaver, and Wells & Siuain for defendant"
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "JAMES H. PADGETT v. S. ANNIE McCOY.\nMarie W. Brown for plaintiff.\nGarland A. Thomasson, Zebulon Weaver, and Wells & Siuain for defendant"
  },
  "file_name": "0508-01",
  "first_page_order": 562,
  "last_page_order": 562
}