{
  "id": 8657077,
  "name": "W. E. GREGORY v. J. R. WALLACE",
  "name_abbreviation": "Gregory v. Wallace",
  "decision_date": "1914-09-16",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "81",
  "last_page": "81",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "168 N.C. 81"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 131,
    "char_count": 1313,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.46,
    "sha256": "2bcaf7c26328688ae288e6fd17d0c709dbd850f13dab49cbaf84c3b48557a4fe",
    "simhash": "1:6e63ff93000d2978",
    "word_count": 225
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:05:21.378028+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "W. E. GREGORY v. J. R. WALLACE."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Peb Oueiam.\n\u2022 The defendant admitted the ownership of the land to be in plaintiff,- but denied any trespass. So that the only issue was the location of plaintiff\u2019s boundary line, and to determine the location of plaintiff\u2019s boundary line it became necessary, on the trial, to locate a certain gum on the east side of the landing field, which was the gum described in the aforesaid deed, from which the line is to run south 45 degrees east to a navigable water-course.\nThis involves exclusively a question of fact and was submitted to the jury in a charge free from error.\nWe have examined the six exceptions to evidence and find them to be without merit.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Peb Oueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Aydlett & Simpson for plaintiff.",
      "Ward & Thompson for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "W. E. GREGORY v. J. R. WALLACE.\n(Filed 16 September, 1914.)\nTrials \u2014 Instructions\u2014Issues of Fact.\nTbis case involves only an issue of fact as to the location of a boundary line between tbe parties from a fixed point given in the deed, and the instructions being correct, no error found.\nAppeal by plaintiff from Ferguson, J., at March Term, 1914, of Cue-RETOOK.\nCivil action, tried upon these issues:\n1. Did the defendant enter and trespass on the lands of the plaintiff, as alleged? Answer; \u201cNo.\u201d\n2. What damages, if any, has the plaintiff sustained thereby?\nThe plaintiff appealed.\nAydlett & Simpson for plaintiff.\nWard & Thompson for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0081-01",
  "first_page_order": 137,
  "last_page_order": 137
}