{
  "id": 8657510,
  "name": "C. P. WESTON et al. v. JOHN L. ROPER LUMBER COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Weston v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.",
  "decision_date": "1914-12-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "98",
  "last_page": "98",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "168 N.C. 98"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "163 N. C., 78",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11270488
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/163/0078-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "81 N. C., 21",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "90 N. C., 499",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8697726
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/90/0499-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "124 N. C., 610",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8660588
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/124/0610-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "160 N. C., 263",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11271146
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/160/0263-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "163 N. C., 78",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11270488
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/163/0078-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 172,
    "char_count": 2052,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.482,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.8193647648740709e-07,
      "percentile": 0.719002343379865
    },
    "sha256": "1420c9613bbf7ff412bbce0761c42254cedd4e11fd3fee9a955b7066e3d0b467",
    "simhash": "1:ba9d6568de99682d",
    "word_count": 363
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:05:21.378028+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "C. P. WESTON et al. v. JOHN L. ROPER LUMBER COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee, Curiam.\nThis case was before this Court at Fall Term, 1912, on appeal from a judgment of nonsuit, and a new trial granted in an opinion by Mr. Justice Walker, 160 N. C., 263. It was before us a second time at Fall Term, 1913, on appeal by defendant, and the ease was fully considered in an opinion by the Chief Justice, and in the judgment of the Superior Court we found no error. 163 N. C., 78,\nWe have again carefully considered the case upon the defendant\u2019s petition, and find no reason to reverse our former judgment.\nThe grounds of error assigned in the petition are substantially the same as those argued and passed upon on the former hearing. In the brief of the learned counsel for the defendant no now fact has been called to our attention, and no new case or authority cited, and no new position assumed.\n\u201cNo case should be reheard upon a petition to rehear unless it was decided hastily and some material point had been overlooked or some direct authority was not called to the attention of the Court.\u201d Weathers v. Borders, 124 N. C., 610; Lockhart v. Bell, 90 N. C., 499; Pell\u2019s Revisal, sec. 1546, and cases cited.\n\u201cWhere the grounds of error assigned in the petition are substantially the same as those argued and passed upon in a former hearing, the Court will not disturb its judgment.\u201d Lewis v. Rountree, 81 N. C., 21.\nThe petition to rehear is\nDismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee, Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Ward, & Thompson, Charles Whedbee, Winston & Biggs for plaintiffs.",
      "W. B. Rodman, A. D. McLean, J. X. Wilson for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "C. P. WESTON et al. v. JOHN L. ROPER LUMBER COMPANY.\n(Filed 9 December, 1914.)\nSupreme Court \u2014 Rehearing\u2014Petition Dismissed.\nTliis petition to rehear having been fully and carefully considered, and it appearing that the errors assigned have already been passed upon in well considered' opinions of this Court, and no new fact has been called to the attention of the Court, or new case or authority cited, of new position assumed, the petition is dismissed.\nPetitioN by defendant to rebear tbe above entitled ease, which is reported in 163 N. C., 78.\nWard, & Thompson, Charles Whedbee, Winston & Biggs for plaintiffs.\nW. B. Rodman, A. D. McLean, J. X. Wilson for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0098-01",
  "first_page_order": 154,
  "last_page_order": 154
}