{
  "id": 8657941,
  "name": "W. A. BURRIS v. J. N. BURRIS",
  "name_abbreviation": "Burris v. Burris",
  "decision_date": "1915-04-28",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "247",
  "last_page": "248",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "169 N.C. 247"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 159,
    "char_count": 1820,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.486,
    "sha256": "e1bcee7740b9b157a965952d36af6b776e0613bf1e901fcf5cf22adf7f844150",
    "simhash": "1:d32e5d2e366dfc0a",
    "word_count": 316
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:16:09.233721+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "W. A. BURRIS v. J. N. BURRIS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curlam.\nIn the brief of the appellant the several exceptions relating to the admissibility of evidence are withdrawn. The only assignment of error is as follows: \u201cThe court erred in rendering judgment as set out in the record.\u201d We must assume, in the absence of any exeep-tions to tbe evidence, or to tbe charge of tbe judge, tbat tbe findings of tbe jury are correct. Tbat being so, we are of opinion tbat sucb findings fully warrant tbe judgment rendered.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curlam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "H. H. McLendon, I. B. Burleson for plaintiff.",
      "Walter E. Brock, Bobinson, Caudle & Bruette for interpleader."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "W. A. BURRIS v. J. N. BURRIS.\n(Filed 28 April, 1915.)\nAppeal and Error \u2014 Exceptions Withdrawn \u2014 Judgments\u2014Presumptions.\nWhen the appellant withdraws his exceptions to the evidence, and none are taken to the judge\u2019s charge to the jury, it will he assumed by the -Supreme Court that the findings of the jury are correct; and under the issues answered in this case the judgment of the trial court thereon, alone excepted to, is affirmed.\nAppeal by interpleader from Lane, J., at November Term, 1914, of ANSON.\nCivil action. There was a judgment against the interpleader, J. A. Parker, for the sum of $208.34, from which he appealed.\nThe following are the issues and findings of the jury:\n1. \"Was the note and mortgage transferred by Harrell Eros. Company to J. A. Parker, as alleged? Answer: \u201cYes.\u201d\n2. What amount, if anything, is the defendant J. N. Burris due J. A. Parker? Answer: \u201c$15.83 and interest from 27 January, 1912.\u201d\n3. What was the value of the property sold under mortgage by J. A. Parker? Answer: \u201c$300.\u201d\n4. What amount, if any, is due plaintiff on his note and mortgage given by J. N. Burris? Answer: .\u201c$194.36, with interest from 28 December, 1910.\u201d\n5. Was the property bought by J. A. Parker at the said sale? Answer: \u201cYes.\u201d\nH. H. McLendon, I. B. Burleson for plaintiff.\nWalter E. Brock, Bobinson, Caudle & Bruette for interpleader."
  },
  "file_name": "0247-01",
  "first_page_order": 299,
  "last_page_order": 300
}