{
  "id": 8657985,
  "name": "HELEN MOWERY v. M. W. MOWERY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Mowery v. Mowery",
  "decision_date": "1915-04-28",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "248",
  "last_page": "248",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "169 N.C. 248"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 129,
    "char_count": 1559,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.463,
    "sha256": "c489ab9bb2e74b90d276002d387cdb347e72116cfb1910ef8eabca61e8e545d5",
    "simhash": "1:4527eb552a1adf18",
    "word_count": 255
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:16:09.233721+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "HELEN MOWERY v. M. W. MOWERY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER OuriaM.\nTbe only assignment of error set out in tbe record is in these words: \u201cTbe defendant assigned as error tbe judgment rendered herein.\u201d It is contended by the defendant tbat tbe affidavits and evidence offered upon tbe motion for alimony are insufficient to support tbe findings of fact made by tbe judge.\n\u2022 No sucb assignment of error is set out in tbe record. If tbe appellant desired to present sucb a contention, be should have assigned bis error by pointing out tbe particular finding of fact which is not supported by tbe evidence.\nNevertheless, we have examined tbe affidavits, and find tbat bis Honor\u2019s findings were fully sustained, and they warrant tbe order allowing alimony to tbe plaintiff pendente lite.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER OuriaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Robinson, Caudle & Pruette for plaintiff.",
      "H. II. McLendon, John W. Gulledige for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "HELEN MOWERY v. M. W. MOWERY.\n(Filed 28 April, 1915.)\nAppeal and Error \u2014 Objections and Exceptions \u2014 Evidence\u2014Judgments.\nWhen on appeal from judgment allowing alimony pendente lite in an action for divorce a mensa, etc., tbe judgment alone is excepted to, it will not raise the question of the sufficiency of supporting affidavits or the findings thereon, it being required that appellant assign error by pointing out the particular finding he claims is not supported by the evidence.\nAppeal by defendant from order of Rountree, J., made 6 March, 1915; from \u00c1NSON.\nCivil action for divorce a mensa et thoro, beard on motion of tbe plaintiff for alimony pendente lite. From tbe order and judgment rendered the defendant appealed.\nRobinson, Caudle & Pruette for plaintiff.\nH. II. McLendon, John W. Gulledige for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0248-01",
  "first_page_order": 300,
  "last_page_order": 300
}