{
  "id": 8684494,
  "name": "Richard Newsom et al. v. William Bufferlow",
  "name_abbreviation": "Newsom v. Bufferlow",
  "decision_date": "1831-06",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "67",
  "last_page": "67",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Dev. Eq. 67"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "17 N.C. 67"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 121,
    "char_count": 1345,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.311,
    "sha256": "345ec7f02bbe302429be2bf7a22a4674d243cf6a2194362e73c112c65f64def6",
    "simhash": "1:0c30568d397ba418",
    "word_count": 236
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:04:28.297091+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Richard Newsom et al. v. William Bufferlow."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Ru\u00edf\u00edj, Judge,\nafter stating the order of reference, proceeded as follows : The clerk, in his report, docs not distinguish between the plaintiff\u2019s own costs, when defendant in ejectment, and those which they paid the plaintiff at law, as his costs, The last only can be decreed to he repaid by the defendant to the plaintiffs. Their own costs the defendants at law threw away, by defending in that court upon an equitable title, and cannot recover back (Keaton v. Cobb). The clerk must again enquire upon that point, and in his report distinguish the taxed costs at law of the plaintiffs, or either of them, from those of the present defendant.\nPer Curiam \u2014 Order renew eh.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Ru\u00edf\u00edj, Judge,"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Upon the coming in of the report, Badger, for the defendant,",
      "Seazoell, for the plaintiffs."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Richard Newsom et al. v. William Bufferlow.\nOne who defends an ejectment upon an equitable title, cannot in equity recover his own costs at law, but he may those he has paid the plaintiff-at law.\nThe casc Keam v. CoM,. fXiwed ^by9' Rum?,-, judp-c-\nAfter the decree made in this cause (ante vol. 1, 379) tor a reconveyance by the defendant to the plaintiffs, of the land conveyed to him by mistake, an order was made that the defendant should repay the plaintiffs the costs of the ejectment, and a reference as to those costs was directed.\nUpon the coming in of the report, Badger, for the defendant,\ncited Keaton v. Cobb (unte vol. 1, 439).\nSeazoell, for the plaintiffs."
  },
  "file_name": "0067-01",
  "first_page_order": 75,
  "last_page_order": 75
}