{
  "id": 8659507,
  "name": "CALDWELL LAND AND LUMBER COMPANY v. GRANVILLE CHESTER and Wife",
  "name_abbreviation": "Caldwell Land & Lumber Co. v. Chester",
  "decision_date": "1915-12-08",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "399",
  "last_page": "400",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "170 N.C. 399"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "113 N. C., 20",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8652103
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/113/0020-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 187,
    "char_count": 2887,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.454,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.565170110192638e-08,
      "percentile": 0.28643542538580435
    },
    "sha256": "554b61e0248e4f9b885941d7610ce3fd43683fe40539e60b53ff94207805c437",
    "simhash": "1:f42dad7a5dc0ad01",
    "word_count": 517
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:19:17.272665+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "CALDWELL LAND AND LUMBER COMPANY v. GRANVILLE CHESTER and Wife."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Clark, C. J.\nIn tbis case, upon tbe verdict of tbe jury coming in, judgment was rendered at tbe April Term of Avery, wbicb adjourned 30 April, 1915. By agreement 90 days was allowed appellants to serve case on appeal and plaintiff allowed 60 days thereafter to file exceptions or counter-ease. Tbe defendants served their case on appeal 8 September, 1915. Tbe plaintiff contested that tbis was too late, and served their exceptions on 19 October, without, however, waiving their right to object that tbe service of tbe case on appeal was too late.\nThe judge properly held that tbe appellants\u2019 case was served too late and refused to settle tbe case on appeal. Tbe appellants contend that they were in time because by consent tbe judgment was to be signed in vacation and was signed on 19 June, being less than 90 days before tbe service of tbe case on appeal.\nTbe judgment was rendered on tbe verdict before tbe adjournment of tbe court, 30 April. It is not necessary that a judgment be signed when it is rendered in open court. Bond v. Wool, 113 N. C., 20, and cases there cited.\nTbe appellants do not distinguish between tbe signing in vacation of a judgment rendered at term and tbe rendering of a judgment in vacation by consent, Revisal, 559. In tbe latter case there is no judgment to appeal,from, and it is not known in whose favor it is until it is rendered; hence tbe time in wbicb to appeal and to serve case on appeal is counted from tbe filing of such judgment in tbe clerk\u2019s office.\nBut when, as in tbis case, tbe judgment is rendered in term tbe party cast has notice and must give bis notice of appeal and serve bis case in tbe prescribed, or agreed, time from tbe adjournment of that term. Tbe appellants were in court when tbe judgment was rendered and gave notice of appeal. By agreement they bad 90 days in wbicb to serve their case on appeal, and failed to do so.\nTbe motion for a certiorari must be denied, and tbe motion of tbe appellees to docket and dismiss under Rule 17 is allowed.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Clark, C. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "S. J. Ervin, Mark Squires wnd W. G. Newland for plaintiff.",
      "Lowe & Love for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "CALDWELL LAND AND LUMBER COMPANY v. GRANVILLE CHESTER and Wife.\n(Filed 8 December, 1915.)\nAppeal and Error \u2014 Case Agreed \u2014 Time\u2014Judgments in Term \u2014 Signature, of Judge \u2014 Rendered Out of Term \u2014 Statutes.\nIt is not required that a judgment rendered in term be signed by the judge, and where the parties agree to an extension of time to serve case, counter-case or exceptions on appeal from a judgment thus rendered, the time must tie computed for serving appellant's case from the end of the term, and not from the time the judgment was actually thereafter signed under an agreement that the judge should do so. Instances where the judgment is rendered out of time have no application. Revisal, sec. 559.\nAppeal by defendants from Ilwrding, J., at April Term, 1915, of Avery.\nS. J. Ervin, Mark Squires wnd W. G. Newland for plaintiff.\nLowe & Love for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0399-01",
  "first_page_order": 461,
  "last_page_order": 462
}