{
  "id": 11272094,
  "name": "S. B. CHANCEY v. NORFOLK AND WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Chancey v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.",
  "decision_date": "1916-03-29",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "756",
  "last_page": "757",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "171 N.C. 756"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 112,
    "char_count": 1397,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.453,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.612833661589519e-08,
      "percentile": 0.40391910879746273
    },
    "sha256": "25f27f0695683493e59d89f506593f2a053e9129cede599ecca1d6fb4e932d83",
    "simhash": "1:25320dba280a8f00",
    "word_count": 225
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:52:28.143754+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "S. B. CHANCEY v. NORFOLK AND WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CubiaM.\nAllowing tbe amendment to the summons was a matter witbin the sound discretion of the judge. The summons had been served on the agent of the Norfolk and Western Railway. The original summons was directed, to the Norfolk and Western Railroad. His Honor very properly allowed the amendment. As the court ordered an alias summons, no question of jurisdiction or venue arises now. The order amending summons- and ordering an alias is not appealable. -\nAppeal dismissed..",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CubiaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Bountree, Davis & Carr, Guthrie & Guthrie, Theo. ~W. Beath for defendant.",
      "No counsel for plaintiff."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "S. B. CHANCEY v. NORFOLK AND WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY.\n(Filed 29 March, 1916.)\nCourts \u2014 Amendments\u2014Summons\u2014Jurisdiction\u2014Venue\u2014Appeal and Error.\nThe original summons in this case was directed to. the defendant \u201crailroad\u201d company, and it is held that no error was committed by the trial judge in allowing an amendment thereof to correctly issue to the defendant \u201crailway\u201d company, and serving it as an alias summons, and this action is not appealable.\nAppeal from order of Daniels, J., November Term, 1915, of Colum:-bus, upon motion of defendant to dismiss for\u2019-want of service.\nThe court permitted an amendment to the original summons by striking out the word railroad and substituting railway, and made an order that an alias summons be issued and served upon the Norfolk and \"Western Railway. The defendant appealed.\nBountree, Davis & Carr, Guthrie & Guthrie, Theo. ~W. Beath for defendant.\nNo counsel for plaintiff."
  },
  "file_name": "0756-01",
  "first_page_order": 808,
  "last_page_order": 809
}