{
  "id": 11254803,
  "name": "MRS. M. D. WALTERS v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Walters v. Southern Railway Co.",
  "decision_date": "1916-11-29",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "590",
  "last_page": "590",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "172 N.C. 590"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 67,
    "char_count": 526,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.506,
    "sha256": "467322931186fe577cf52d5a1b9ab7b5ab3d0e7d36d14faa823204b4be56be44",
    "simhash": "1:0084aa88bf0ea6c6",
    "word_count": 91
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:21:58.562423+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MRS. M. D. WALTERS v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "HoKe, J.\nIn this cause the facts in evidence and the questions as considered and decided by the Court are the same as those presented in the appeal of Hinton v. R. R. (next preceding case), and, for the reasons given in that opinion, the judgment recovered by plaintiff in the court below is affirmed.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "HoKe, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J ohn A. Barringer for plaintiff.",
      "Wilson & Ferguson for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MRS. M. D. WALTERS v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY.\n(Filed 29 November, 1916.)\nCivil actioN tried before Cline, J., at March Term, 1916, of GuiL-EORD.\nJ ohn A. Barringer for plaintiff.\nWilson & Ferguson for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0590-01",
  "first_page_order": 656,
  "last_page_order": 656
}