{
  "id": 11255732,
  "name": "BROWN v. HARDING",
  "name_abbreviation": "Brown v. Harding",
  "decision_date": "1916-10-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "835",
  "last_page": "835",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "172 N.C. 835"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 59,
    "char_count": 585,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.477,
    "sha256": "74c8e0af614d56800e664f812ba8c7654c6387fac09b2df410ecdf35cc36e5c3",
    "simhash": "1:aa57f6519bb0a925",
    "word_count": 105
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:21:58.562423+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "BeowN, J., not sitting."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "BROWN v. HARDING."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PeR CueiaM.\nTbe rule limiting tbe number of pages in a brief for wbieb costs may be taxed to twenty pages bas not been repealed, and, therefore, tbe clerk will tax tbe costs in this case according to tbat rale. Tbe motion to retax is denied, and tbe clerk will tax costs to tbe successful party for briefs at twenty pages.\nBeowN, J., not sitting.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PeR CueiaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "BROWN v. HARDING.\n(Filed 4 October, 1916.)\nAppeal and Error \u2014 Costs\u2014Brief\u2014Rule of Court.\nCosts of brief exceeding twenty pages will not be taxed against tbe unsuccessful party, under tbe rule of tbe Supreme Court.\nBrown, J., not sitting."
  },
  "file_name": "0835-01",
  "first_page_order": 901,
  "last_page_order": 901
}