{
  "id": 11272049,
  "name": "J. W. TIMBERLAKE v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Timberlake v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad",
  "decision_date": "1917-04-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "715",
  "last_page": "715",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "173 N.C. 715"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 89,
    "char_count": 747,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.458,
    "sha256": "508b1d9abb5bd89376feaab2c6a56c6867b62744a8ae2d10291f0e85fa9bfd18",
    "simhash": "1:d56702d38449ae48",
    "word_count": 123
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:49:44.051040+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "J. W. TIMBERLAKE v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nUpon the evidence in this case, following the well settled decisions of this Court, we are of opinion -that the motion to non-suit was properly allowed.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Q. K. Nimocks, F. T. Bennett for plaintiff.",
      "Rose & Rose for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "J. W. TIMBERLAKE v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY.\n(Filed 4 April, 1917.)\nCivil action, tried before Winston, J., at October Term, 1916, of CUMBERLAND.\nThis is an action for damage on account of personal injury. The evidence tended to prove that the plaintiff- was overtaken, struck, and injured by defendant\u2019s engine while he was walking alongside the track in the city of Fayetteville on September 11, 1915. At the close of the evidence a motion to nonsuit was sustained. Plaintiff appealed.\nQ. K. Nimocks, F. T. Bennett for plaintiff.\nRose & Rose for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0715-01",
  "first_page_order": 773,
  "last_page_order": 773
}