{
  "id": 8660601,
  "name": "L. P. HORTON v. L. E. WILSON",
  "name_abbreviation": "Horton v. Wilson",
  "decision_date": "1918-05-15",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "533",
  "last_page": "534",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "175 N.C. 533"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "168 N. C., 1",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8656751
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/168/0001-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "167 N. C., 600",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11273602
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/167/0600-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "148 N. C., 862",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 186,
    "char_count": 2500,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.485,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.426357505622917e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6500145375270914
    },
    "sha256": "9794d850d527658c6245f13cf63c561518dd25d3a5da617f91713978418bf799",
    "simhash": "1:6320c2664b593398",
    "word_count": 444
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:50:36.007196+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "L. P. HORTON v. L. E. WILSON."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "BbowN, J.\nPlaintiff sues to recover of defendant as endorser on a note payable to defendant and endorsed to plaintiff. Tbe note was secured by a mortgage on a mare and mule. Tbe defense is lack of notice of dishonor. Tbe motion to nonsuit should have been sustained.\nTbe defendant, being an endorser, comes within tbe cases of Perry v. Taylor, 148 N. C., 862; Sykes v. Everett, 167 N. C., 600; Houser v. Fayssoux, 168 N. C., 1.\nA surety is a maker of a note and is primarily liable for tbe debt, and is not entitled to notice of dishonor, while an endorser is liable conditionally, and does not undertake to pay absolutely, but only after notice of dishonor, and is entitled to such notice.\nThere is no evidence of notice of dishonor through the mail or otherwise. Notice to defendant by plaintiff, given the day before the note became due, that the note would fall due the next day, that plaintiff had been informed that the maker of the note could not pay it, and that he intended to hold defendant liable for balance due on it after selling mortgaged property, is insufficient notice of nonpayment.\nNotice of dishonor must be given after the note is dishonored by nonpayment when due, and not before it is due. A note cannot be said to be dishonored by the maker until after it matures. Notice given to an endorser before maturity and before default of the maker in anticipation of a default is a nullity. Daniel on Neg. Inst., 6th Ed., by Calvert., sec. 1035.\nIn this case plaintiff testified: \u201cI did not present the note to Mr. Wilson, or tell him that\u2019 Honeycutt had failed to pay it, but I did tell his son the day before the note was due.\u201d\nThis is not notice of dishonor. The motion to nonsuit is allowed.\nReversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "BbowN, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "No counsel for plaintiff.",
      "J. Bis Bay for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "L. P. HORTON v. L. E. WILSON.\n(Filed 15 May, 1918.)\n1. Bills and Notes \u2014 Negotiable Instruments \u2014 Endorser\u2014Notice\u2014Dishonor.\nThe liability of an endorser on a promissory note is conditional, entitling Mm to notice of dishonor; and payment may not be enforced against him unless .such notice has properly been given.\n2. Same \u2014 Anticipated Dishonor.\nNotice given to an endorser on promissory note prior to maturity, in anticipation of dishonor by the maker, is not sufficient to hold him to liability thereon; such notice to be valid must be properly given after the note is dishonored.\nAppeal from justice of tbe peace, tried before Ferguson, J., at Fall Term, 1917, of YaNcey.\nFrom tbe judgment rendered, defendant appealed.\nNo counsel for plaintiff.\nJ. Bis Bay for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0533-01",
  "first_page_order": 587,
  "last_page_order": 588
}