{
  "id": 8661727,
  "name": "U. W. KEENER v. GRAHAM COUNTY LUMBER COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Keener v. Graham County Lumber Co.",
  "decision_date": "1918-05-28",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "701",
  "last_page": "701",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "175 N.C. 701"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 93,
    "char_count": 757,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.503,
    "sha256": "49177b236910fd8523a10ac19e5bc90bd7edc79f89cfe63b2e36e8bbb515f0b0",
    "simhash": "1:0068d5bc3bb659cb",
    "word_count": 128
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:50:36.007196+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "U. W. KEENER v. GRAHAM COUNTY LUMBER COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Peb Oubiam :\nAction for damage by loss of logs. The case is exactly like Sumner v. same defendant, decided at this term. The plaintiff did not propose to contradict, add to or vary tbe written contract, but to show a later and fresh agreement as to how the logs should be delivered. The two eases are not distinguishable, and the controlling principles are stated in the Sumner case, with the authorities sustaining them, and there was no error upon the issue as to the damages.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Peb Oubiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Alley & Leatherwood for plaintiff.",
      "M. W. Bell for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "U. W. KEENER v. GRAHAM COUNTY LUMBER COMPANY.\n(Filed 28 May, 1918.)\nContracts \u2014 Parol Evidence \u2014 New Agreement.\nAppeal by defendant from judgment rendered at March Term, 1918, of SwaiN, Lane, J., presiding.\nAlley & Leatherwood for plaintiff.\nM. W. Bell for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0701-01",
  "first_page_order": 755,
  "last_page_order": 755
}