{
  "id": 8655523,
  "name": "LILLIE W. DAVIS, Admx., v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Davis v. Southern Railway Co.",
  "decision_date": "1918-10-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "186",
  "last_page": "187",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "176 N.C. 186"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "175 N. C., 650",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 122,
    "char_count": 1347,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.469,
    "sha256": "99e3cb6b5ca142376ecbb194cc4dac6c5068bc826801597b3ec71e56861f31b9",
    "simhash": "1:10258d3a0b3f10f0",
    "word_count": 232
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:39:13.878101+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "LILLIE W. DAVIS, Admx., v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Bboww, J.\nMotion made in this cause by defendant, appellant, to-recall the mandate and judgment rendered at last term, and to award a new trial only upon the issues of negligence, contributory negligence,, and damages.\nThe case is reported and issues set out in 175 N. C., 650.\nThere is no doubt as to the power of this Court to confine a new trial to such issues as the Court deems necessary to a proper determination of the issues raised by the pleadings.\nThere are a number of cases in our Eeports where partial new trials have been granted.\nIt is now too late to entertain the defendant\u2019s motion. The case has passed from our jurisdiction and is now pending in the Superior Court of Buncombe County.\nThe only method by which the case could have been brought again within our control is by petition to rehear, which must be filed within forty days after the opinion has been handed down.\nMotion denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Bboww, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "LILLIE W. DAVIS, Admx., v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY.\n(Filed 9 October, 1918.)\nAppeal and Error\u2014 Supreme Court\u2014 Opinion Certified\u2014 Courts\u2014 Jurisdiction \u2014 Petition to Rehear.\nAfter a decision of the Supreme Court has been certified down, the Court is without jurisdiction to entertain a motion to recall the mandate and judgment rendered and reconsider it; the only method for such being upon petition to rehear, filed according to the rules."
  },
  "file_name": "0186-01",
  "first_page_order": 238,
  "last_page_order": 239
}