{
  "id": 11272230,
  "name": "L. B. SASSER, N. E. BUNTING and THOMAS HILL v. W. N. HARRISS, WALTER H. BUTLER and D. N. CHADWICK",
  "name_abbreviation": "Sasser v. Harriss",
  "decision_date": "1919-10-15",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "322",
  "last_page": "323",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "178 N.C. 322"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 163,
    "char_count": 2040,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.456,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.207966869300525e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3290070193281539
    },
    "sha256": "cb2232f505643dc3e4704ab3fed29158818b48c88df95f4bf93fb15d8ef0aa1c",
    "simhash": "1:94f6e9183e302bfe",
    "word_count": 359
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:32:08.818827+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "L. B. SASSER, N. E. BUNTING and THOMAS HILL v. W. N. HARRISS, WALTER H. BUTLER and D. N. CHADWICK."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "BeowN, J.\nThis as an action by the plaintiffs against the defendants, constituting the members of the city board of elections of the city of Wilmington, for the purpose of having declared void the call made by the board for the primary election under the act of the General Assembly of 1919, authorizing the board of elections to call the primary and fix the date for the holding thereof, which act is recited in the record.\nThe cause was heard before his Honor, Thomas II. Calvert, judge, at the March Term, 1919, of the Superior Court of New Hanover County, and upon said hearing his Honor restrained the holding of the said primary election on the date fixed by the board, and ordered the election tO| be held on the date as provided by the law in force relative thereto, prior to the passage of the act of 1919, and from the judgment of the court defendants appealed.\nIt appears that the primary election has long since been held and doubtless the candidates now have been duly elected. Nothing can now be accomplished by setting aside the order of Judge Calvert. If his judgment was reversed this Court could, not now order another primary. The question has thus become merely a moot question and there is nothing for the judgment of the Court to operate upon.\nThe appeal is dismissed.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "BeowN, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Iredell Meares for plaintiff.",
      "JE. K. Bryan and A. Cr. Bicaud for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "L. B. SASSER, N. E. BUNTING and THOMAS HILL v. W. N. HARRISS, WALTER H. BUTLER and D. N. CHADWICK.\n(Filed 15 October, 1919.)\nAppeal and Error \u2014 \u201cMoot Questions\u201d \u2014 Appeal Dismissed \u2014 Calls\u2014Cities and Towns \u2014 Primaries.\nWhere the trial court has restrained a city board of elections from calling a primary election under the act of 1919, and the election has been \u25a0 held under the prior law, in force at the time, by order of the judge: Held, the Supreme Court may not then order another primary, and the question presented becoming a \u201cmoot\u201d one, the appeal will be dismissed.\nAppeal by defendant from Galvert, J., at the March Term, 1919, of New IIaNoveR.\nIredell Meares for plaintiff.\nJE. K. Bryan and A. Cr. Bicaud for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0322-01",
  "first_page_order": 388,
  "last_page_order": 389
}