{
  "id": 8654495,
  "name": "STATE v. SILLS",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Sills",
  "decision_date": "1920-10-20",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "660",
  "last_page": "660",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "180 N.C. 660"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 66,
    "char_count": 546,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.426,
    "sha256": "40306e0e416c92f68108888f3d3e7b2ddc2f9b0c885e59d6365db7f8ec977c3e",
    "simhash": "1:379ac69d02b0add8",
    "word_count": 87
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:30:08.757715+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. SILLS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nWe have examined tbe record, and are of opinion there is evidence to support each element of tbe crime charged, although letters of tbe prosecutrix in evidence tend to discredit her.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General Manning and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.",
      "W. M. Person for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. SILLS.\n(Filed 20 October, 1920.)\nAppeal by defendant from Daniels, J., at May Term, 1920, of ErANKLIN.\nTbis is an indictment for seduction. Tbe defendant was convicted,, and appealed from tbe judgment pronounced on tbe verdict.\nAttorney-General Manning and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.\nW. M. Person for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0660-01",
  "first_page_order": 718,
  "last_page_order": 718
}