{
  "id": 8654514,
  "name": "C. W. BUNN v. J. ASHLEY WALL",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bunn v. Wall",
  "decision_date": "1920-10-20",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "662",
  "last_page": "663",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "180 N.C. 662"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "113 N. C., 49",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8652233
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/113/0049-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 121,
    "char_count": 1306,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.454,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.8591662004228935e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3653927313909035
    },
    "sha256": "eaee34c946552f126b27bef39f78cc048e6b61606211f728a4daf389eff3b5b8",
    "simhash": "1:2f9f2738060bc9fc",
    "word_count": 223
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:30:08.757715+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "C. W. BUNN v. J. ASHLEY WALL."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee CttbiaM.\nParol evidence was admissible to establish the contract about the barn, although there was a written lease, because the two contracts were separate and distinct, and we are of opinion there was circumstantial evidence of authority on the part of Wall to make the contract.\nThe damages claimed are difficult of admeasurement, but not more so than those allowed in Spencer v. Hamilton, 113 N. C., 49, in which a counterclaim, alleging loss of crops by reason of a breach of contract to do certain ditching, was sustained.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee CttbiaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. 8. Manning and Little & Barnes for plaintiff.",
      "Armistead J ones & Son for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "C. W. BUNN v. J. ASHLEY WALL.\n(Filed 20 October, 1920.)\nContracts, Written \u2014 Parol Evidence \u2014 Landlord and Tenant \u2014 Leases.\nWhere there is a written lease between the landlord and tenant and under a separate and distinct agreement the latter lias built a barn on the lands for the former, parol evidence of the agreement to build the barn is competent.\nAppeal by defendant from Daniels, J., at the second January Term, 1920, of Waite.\n\u25a0 This is an action to recover damages for breach of contract to build a tobacco barn for the plaintiff, who was a tenant on the land of the defendant Privett.\nThere was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant \u00e1ppealed.\nJ. 8. Manning and Little & Barnes for plaintiff.\nArmistead J ones & Son for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0662-01",
  "first_page_order": 720,
  "last_page_order": 721
}