{
  "id": 8654530,
  "name": "DAVID JORDAN v. TIDEWATER POWER COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Jordan v. Tidewater Power Co.",
  "decision_date": "1920-10-27",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "664",
  "last_page": "664",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "180 N.C. 664"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "126 N. C., 894",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8662993
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/126/0894-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "167 N. C., 611",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11273626
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/167/0611-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 109,
    "char_count": 988,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.486,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2076273558805938
    },
    "sha256": "c6cb55be63674666bebd98e65385891eeb125cb01986c7069e0b682e5652190e",
    "simhash": "1:2f7a19a4eabff918",
    "word_count": 167
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:30:08.757715+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "DAVID JORDAN v. TIDEWATER POWER COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Peb Oubiam.\nThere are 41 assignments of error in tbe record. Five of them relate to tbe evidence. Tbe remaining assignments are directed to tbe charge of tbe judge. It is impossible to consider all of tbe assignments in an opinion of reasonable length. We have carefully examined them, and can find no substantial error. Tbe charge of tbe judge is full and clear, and based upon tbe principles of law as laid down in Bagwell v. R. R., 167 N. C., 611, and Crampton v. Ivie, 126 N. C., 894.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Peb Oubiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "' Wright & Stevens and W. P. Stacy for plaintiff.",
      "Rountree & Davis for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "DAVID JORDAN v. TIDEWATER POWER COMPANY.\n(Filed 27 October, 1920.)\nNegligence \u2014 Instructions.\nAppeal from Quion, J., at April Term, 1920, of New Hanover. Tbe following issues were submitted:\n\u201c1. Was tbe plaintiff injured by tbe negligence of tbe defendant, as alleged in tbe complaint? Answer: No.\u2019\n\u201c2. Wbat damages, if any, is tbe plaintiff entitled to recover?\u201d\nFrom judgment rendered plaintiff appealed.\n' Wright & Stevens and W. P. Stacy for plaintiff.\nRountree & Davis for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0664-01",
  "first_page_order": 722,
  "last_page_order": 722
}