{
  "id": 8654583,
  "name": "D. L. BURCHAM v. HENRY WOLFE",
  "name_abbreviation": "Burcham v. Wolfe",
  "decision_date": "1920-11-17",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "672",
  "last_page": "672",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "180 N.C. 672"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 88,
    "char_count": 946,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.454,
    "sha256": "3fcb56136cc7aa18825cb7f6a33be2ebf1696717aba71c06d34ca513a60cb5a4",
    "simhash": "1:ef91d6e188b49ddb",
    "word_count": 156
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:30:08.757715+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "D. L. BURCHAM v. HENRY WOLFE."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee CuRiam.\nUpon examination of the record we find that there was no motion to nonsuit, and no prayer for instruction which raises the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to be submitted to the jury. Therefore the judgment is.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee CuRiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "T. W. Kallam for plaintiff.",
      "W. L. Reece and Garter & Garter for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "D. L. BURCHAM v. HENRY WOLFE.\n(Filed 17 November, 1920.)\nAppeal and Error \u2014 Objections and Exceptions \u2014 Evidence\u2014Motions\u2014Non-suit \u2014 Instructions.\nTbe question of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a verdict against the defendant in an action against a register of deeds for wrongfully issuing a marriage license, should be raised by a motion to nonsuit or a proper prayer for instruction, for it to be considered on appeal.\nAppeal from Ray, Jat April Term, 1920, of Surrt, to recover the penalty against a register of deeds for wrongfully issuing a marriage license. From the judgment rendered the defendant appealed.\nT. W. Kallam for plaintiff.\nW. L. Reece and Garter & Garter for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0672-01",
  "first_page_order": 730,
  "last_page_order": 730
}