{
  "id": 8656458,
  "name": "HENRY B. SPEARS, by His Next Friend, v. TALLASSEE POWER COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Spears v. Tallassee Power Co.",
  "decision_date": "1921-06-03",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "447",
  "last_page": "448",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "181 N.C. 447"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "179 N. C., 657",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8657381
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/179/0657-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "178 N. C., 503",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11273066
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/178/0503-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "178 N. C., 513",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11273114
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/178/0513-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 136,
    "char_count": 1474,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.486,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.610892401142068e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4503416994581537
    },
    "sha256": "f8c4b17e90b79359b74f3ae48ca4c3469e7a1ec48a1d6f18ad35d9188b541b7d",
    "simhash": "1:67dc5aee78338e8f",
    "word_count": 254
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:46:48.388810+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "HENRY B. SPEARS, by His Next Friend, v. TALLASSEE POWER COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Allen, J.\nThere are ten assignments of error, but all of them are abandoned because not considered in the brief of appellant (Allen v. Reidsville, 178 N. C., 513) except one, which is to a statement of a contention of the parties, and this exception is disposed of by the record, which says, \u201cNo objection was made .or exception taken at the time the \"judge was charging the jury,\u201d and not until the case on appeal was settled.\nAn objection to a statement of a contention must be made at the time, and comes too late after verdict. Price v. Edwards, 178 N. C., 503; Hall v. Giessell, 179 N. C., 657.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Allen, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. Laurence Jones, M. P. Spears, and Stack, Parker & Craig for plaintiff.",
      "B. L. Smith, E. A. Gouch, and Manning, Bickett & Ferguson for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "HENRY B. SPEARS, by His Next Friend, v. TALLASSEE POWER COMPANY.\n(Filed 3 June, 1921.)\n1. Appeal and Error \u2014 Briefs\u2014Objections and Exceptions.\nExceptions not considered in appellant\u2019s brief are taken as abandoned on appeal. .\n2. Appeal and Error \u2014 Instructions\u2014Contentions\u2014Objections and Exceptions.\nWhen it appears from the record of the case on appeal that the appellant excepted to the statement by the trial judge of his contention only, after verdict, it comes too late and will not be considered.\nAppeal by defendant from McElroy, J., at the August Term, 1920, of UNION.\nThis'is an action to recover damages for personal injuries.\nThere was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.\nJ. Laurence Jones, M. P. Spears, and Stack, Parker & Craig for plaintiff.\nB. L. Smith, E. A. Gouch, and Manning, Bickett & Ferguson for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0447-01",
  "first_page_order": 499,
  "last_page_order": 500
}