{
  "id": 8656625,
  "name": "F. M. WYNNS v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wynns v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad",
  "decision_date": "1921-03-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "477",
  "last_page": "477",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "181 N.C. 477"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "138 N. C., 38",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11268645
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/138/0038-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 99,
    "char_count": 810,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.478,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20765670122080476
    },
    "sha256": "cbe03fdd4363e41641b827717a743343febde500c88067da4fa977315e97b9cd",
    "simhash": "1:b9035ae85f30e109",
    "word_count": 133
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:46:48.388810+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "F. M. WYNNS v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cubiam.\nUpon the argument of this cause, defendants relied entirely upon their motion for judgment as of nonsuit, assigning as error his Honor\u2019s refusal to grant the same. Considering the evidence in its most favorable light for the plaintiff, the accepted position on such motion, we think the testimony was sufficient to be submitted to the jury,,. under authority of Ramsbottom v. R. R., 138 N. C., 38.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cubiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Winston & Matthews for plaintiff.",
      "J. N. Pruden and Oillam & Davenport for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "F. M. WYNNS v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD et al.\n(Filed 2 March, 1921.)\nAppeal by defendant from Lyon, J., at November Term, 1920, of Beetle.\nCivil action for damages, tried upon an alleged negligent injury to plaintiff\u2019s two mules. Yerdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Defendants appealed.\nWinston & Matthews for plaintiff.\nJ. N. Pruden and Oillam & Davenport for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0477-01",
  "first_page_order": 529,
  "last_page_order": 529
}