{
  "id": 8657039,
  "name": "P. V. BOONE v. J. A. NEWSOME and Wife",
  "name_abbreviation": "Boone v. Newsome",
  "decision_date": "1921-04-20",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "501",
  "last_page": "502",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "181 N.C. 501"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 144,
    "char_count": 1516,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.473,
    "sha256": "83118ca91eb3c1a847e334cdeaad08e5af7f0092aaf2b09c4d210654ceb5b3ea",
    "simhash": "1:e8983e2e12032fd5",
    "word_count": 252
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:46:48.388810+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "P. V. BOONE v. J. A. NEWSOME and Wife."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nPlaintiff\u2019s exceptions and assignments of error relate only to the charge of the court upon general propositions of law, and after a careful investigation of the record we find no sufficient reason for disturbing the verdict and judgment.\nPlaintiff alleged that he was the owner and in possession of a certain tract of land, including the locus in quo. It was not denied that plaintiff and defendants were abutting property owners, but it was the contention of defendants that plaintiff\u2019s deed did not cover the land in controversy, and that their own possession of said premises -was rightful and lawful. Upon this disputed question of fact the jury\u2019s verdict was adverse to the plaintiff.\nThe exceptions must be overruled.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "II. W. Gobi, Jr., and Fentress & Jerome for plaintiff.",
      "S. B. Adams and B. G. Sirudwiclc for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "P. V. BOONE v. J. A. NEWSOME and Wife.\n(Filed 20 April, 1921.)\nTrespass \u2014 Evidence\u2014Verdict\u2014Appeal and Error.\nWhere a verdict is rendered upon conflicting evidence and without legal error of the court, it is conclusive on appeal.\nAppeal by plaintiff from Ray, J., at November Term, 1920, of Guilpoed.\nCivil action for trespass which involved tbe true location of tbe dividing line between tbe premises of plaintiff and defendants who were adjoining landowners. Tbe locus in quo is a strip of land about 28 feet wide, to which both parties claimed title and possession.\nUpon issues joined, there was a verdict and judgment in favor of defendants. Plaintiff appealed.\nII. W. Gobi, Jr., and Fentress & Jerome for plaintiff.\nS. B. Adams and B. G. Sirudwiclc for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0501-01",
  "first_page_order": 553,
  "last_page_order": 554
}