{
  "id": 8658221,
  "name": "ROBERT C. WALLACE v. SOUTHERN COTTON OIL COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wallace v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.",
  "decision_date": "1921-09-14",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "755",
  "last_page": "756",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "182 N.C. 755"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 103,
    "char_count": 953,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.471,
    "sha256": "ea2d0cf7bb640f86e5aaed54f53bf7b6630304e7bba2d6b26ce7156eb4c6b18d",
    "simhash": "1:0912b264871835fd",
    "word_count": 152
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:57:09.696199+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ROBERT C. WALLACE v. SOUTHERN COTTON OIL COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per CubiaM.\nAll the defendant\u2019s exceptions and assignments of error, not abandoned in its brief, are directed exclusively to the charge. After a careful examination of the Court\u2019s charge to the jury and the defendant\u2019s exceptions thereto, we can find no prejudicial or reversible error. A perusal of the record, in its entirety, leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried in substantial conformity to our decisions and we have discovered no sufficient reason for disturbing the result.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per CubiaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Battle & Winslow for plaintiff.",
      "M. V. Barnhill and F. S. Spruill for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ROBERT C. WALLACE v. SOUTHERN COTTON OIL COMPANY.\n(Filed 14 September, 1921.)\nAppeal by defendant from Galvert, J., at January Term, 1921, of Nash.\nAction to recover damages for an alleged negligent injury, tried upon the usual issues of negligence, contributory negligence and damages. From a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff the defendant appealed.\nBattle & Winslow for plaintiff.\nM. V. Barnhill and F. S. Spruill for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0755-01",
  "first_page_order": 825,
  "last_page_order": 826
}