{
  "id": 8658323,
  "name": "JOHN A. MIDGETT, Sr., v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Midgett v. Norfolk Southern Railroad",
  "decision_date": "1921-09-21",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "758",
  "last_page": "759",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "182 N.C. 758"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 135,
    "char_count": 1430,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.456,
    "sha256": "6ef755b85cea14b6c1b6d617dc2824c793577c7a2cd25dc1b16871be744c53b3",
    "simhash": "1:35317556d220ab74",
    "word_count": 232
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:57:09.696199+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "JOHN A. MIDGETT, Sr., v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Fee Cueiam.\nTbe only exception presented for our consideration comes from bis Honor\u2019s refusal to grant tbe defendant\u2019s motion for judgment as of nonsuit. We bave carefully examined tbe evidence, and bave reached tbe conclusion tbat tbe reasonable inferences arising therefrom are sufficient to carry tbe case to tbe jury. No material benefit would be derived from setting out tbe evidence, as it presents only a question of fact.\nUpon tbe record and tbe exceptions, we think tbe judgment should be affirmed; and it is so ordered.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Fee Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "P. W. McMullan, B. G. Crisp, and Aydlett & Simpson for plaintiff.",
      "Thompson & Wilson for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "JOHN A. MIDGETT, Sr., v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY.\n(Filed 21 September, 1921.)\nAppeal and Error \u2014 Evidence\u2014Nonsuit\u2014Motions.\nFrom this appeal of tbe defendant from tbe refusal of tbe court to grant bis motion as of nonsuit upon tbe evidence, tbe evidence is held sufficient to bave taken tbe case to tbe jury.\nAppeal by defendant from Ferguson, J., at June Term, 1921, of Daee.\nAction to recover damages for an alleged negligent injury to plaintiff\u2019s property. Upon denial of liability and issues joined, the jury returned the following verdict:\n\u201c1. Did tbe defendant negligently injure tbe boat of tbe plaintiff as alleged? Answer: \u2018Yes.\u2019\n\u201c2. \"What damage, if any, is plaintiff entitled to recover ? Answer: \u2018$200.\u2019 \u201d\nFrom a judgment in favor 'of plaintiff, tbe defendant appealed.\nP. W. McMullan, B. G. Crisp, and Aydlett & Simpson for plaintiff.\nThompson & Wilson for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0758-02",
  "first_page_order": 828,
  "last_page_order": 829
}