{
  "id": 8658436,
  "name": "CORBETT BUGGY COMPANY v. GETHRO McLAMB et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Corbett Buggy Co. v. McLamb",
  "decision_date": "1921-09-28",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "762",
  "last_page": "763",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "182 N.C. 762"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "139 N. C., 555",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8653148
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/139/0555-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 135,
    "char_count": 1494,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.442,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20767484899698785
    },
    "sha256": "6206d5b00559f0ca860d18e5b45c8edee93207a4e28536b80197d810b8d1eb18",
    "simhash": "1:a49a3f87006da2ca",
    "word_count": 248
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:57:09.696199+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "CORBETT BUGGY COMPANY v. GETHRO McLAMB et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe judgment which forms the basis of this appeal was rendered at the November Term, 1920, of Harnett Superior Court. The record was not docketed here until 27 August, 1921, long after the term at which the case should have been heard had expired. lienee, the plaintiff\u2019s motion to dismiss the appeal must be allowed. S. v. Telfair, 139 N. C., 555.\nNotwithstanding the motion to dismiss, we have examined the record and have been unable to find any reason for disturbing the result below. Upon the merits, the case should be affirmed.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "L. J. Best and Clifford & Townsend for plaintiff.",
      "F. F. Young for Beth and Natham McLamb."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "CORBETT BUGGY COMPANY v. GETHRO McLAMB et al.\n(Filed 28 September, 1921.)\nAppeal and Error \u2014 Docketing' of Record \u2014 Dismissal.\nAppellee\u2019s motion to dismiss in tbe Supreme Court will be allowed if tlie appellant has failed to have the record docketed until after the expiration of the term in the Supreme Court at which it should have been docketed.\nAppeal by defendant from Devin, J., at November Term, 1920, of Harnett.\nThis was a motion, filed in the Superior Court, to set aside two judgments upon the ground of excusable neglect and upon the further ground that they purported to be consent judgments; whereas, movants allege that said judgments were entered by their codefendant without authority from them, and without their consent. . From a judgment rendered at the November Term, 1920, overruling the motion, defendants appealed.\nL. J. Best and Clifford & Townsend for plaintiff.\nF. F. Young for Beth and Natham McLamb."
  },
  "file_name": "0762-02",
  "first_page_order": 832,
  "last_page_order": 833
}