{
  "id": 8658267,
  "name": "J. H. CLARK and Wife, M. J. CLARK, v. C. A. BROADWAY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Clark v. Broadway",
  "decision_date": "1922-06-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "680",
  "last_page": "681",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "183 N.C. 680"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 133,
    "char_count": 1461,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.469,
    "sha256": "40ddb614c6c89ed5e7e7e71218547defec28be479d4dc3624151f1a8691abd6a",
    "simhash": "1:0ebea583310b89cb",
    "word_count": 253
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:03:22.299745+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "J. H. CLARK and Wife, M. J. CLARK, v. C. A. BROADWAY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis was a proceeding by adjacent landowners to settle a dispute as to the true location of the dividing line between their -respective properties. The land claimed by the feme plaintiff is known as a part of the Council Hooten lands, and the land claimed by the defendant is known as the Jesse \"W. Broadway land. Both tracts are located in Oontentnea Neck Township, Lenoir County.\nJ. W. Grainger purchased the Hooten lands in 1891 and conveyed \u25a0same to feme plaintiff in 1900. The same J. W. Grainger purchased the 'Broadway land in 1890, and conveyed this land to defendant\u2019s predecessor in title in the year 1903.\nCounsel on both sides have filed interesting and elaborate briefs \u2022, but, .as we view the contentions of the parties, the case seems to have been tried in substantial conformity to the law 'appertaining to the facts, and -we have found no ruling or action on the part of the learned judge which \u25a0would warrant a reversal or an order for a new trial. The verdict and .judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Moore & Groom, and Gowper, Whitaker & Allen for plaintiffs.",
      "Bouse & Bouse for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "J. H. CLARK and Wife, M. J. CLARK, v. C. A. BROADWAY.\n(Filed 2 June, 1922.)\nAppeal by defendant from Daniels, J., at November Term, 1921, of LeNOIR, in an action to determine the true location of the boundary line between the lands of plaintiffs and the defendant.\nFrom a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiffs, the defendant appealed.\nMoore & Groom, and Gowper, Whitaker & Allen for plaintiffs.\nBouse & Bouse for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0680-01",
  "first_page_order": 740,
  "last_page_order": 741
}