{
  "id": 11270992,
  "name": "S. P. COLE et al. v. THE SCHOOL COMMITTEE OF CARTHAGE GRADED SCHOOL",
  "name_abbreviation": "Cole v. School Committee of Carthage Graded School",
  "decision_date": "1922-12-13",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "477",
  "last_page": "477",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "184 N.C. 477"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 126,
    "char_count": 1285,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.455,
    "sha256": "6de360d20de843179d45eee36856626b192d20f832cde5da225cfd059f1c1ef6",
    "simhash": "1:5a89f29f26e49be2",
    "word_count": 202
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:54:19.408476+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "S. P. COLE et al. v. THE SCHOOL COMMITTEE OF CARTHAGE GRADED SCHOOL."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Stacy, J.\nThe pertinent and controlling facts in the instant case are substantially similar to those in Heckert v. Graded School, ante, 475, just decided, and for the reasons assigned in that opinion \u2014 the two cases being governed by the same principles \u2014 it follows that his Honor below was correct in denying the plaintiffs\u2019 application for injunctive relief. The validity of the-consolidation, and of the proposed issue of bonds, will be upheld.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Stacy, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "8. It. Hoyle for plaintiffs.",
      "U. L. Spence for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "S. P. COLE et al. v. THE SCHOOL COMMITTEE OF CARTHAGE GRADED SCHOOL.\n(Filed 13 December, 1922.)\nSchool Districts \u2014 Schools\u2014Consolidation\u2014Taxation\u2014Bonds\u2014Elections.\n(Por digest, see Eeclcert v. GradeO, School, ante, 475.)\nAppeal by plaintiffs from Broclc, J.\u201e at chambers in Wadesboro, 30 November, 1922, from Mooee.\nCivil action to restrain the defendants from issuing and offering for sale certain school bonds, upon the alleged ground that the elections under which the district in question, to wit, the Carthage Graded School District, was enlarged, and the bonds approved by a majority of the qualified voters resident within the enlarged district, were illegally held, and are therefore void.\nFrom an order denying the application for relief, plaintiffs appealed.\n8. It. Hoyle for plaintiffs.\nU. L. Spence for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0477-01",
  "first_page_order": 533,
  "last_page_order": 533
}