{
  "id": 11271579,
  "name": "GEORGE JAMES v. L. J. BAKER",
  "name_abbreviation": "James v. Baker",
  "decision_date": "1922-09-20",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "612",
  "last_page": "612",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "184 N.C. 612"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 115,
    "char_count": 1146,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.461,
    "sha256": "3f48b3d8c1f9ce37138cee82ba43c7310fee5aada03e48474792d5ba6bb9db81",
    "simhash": "1:e589697297421771",
    "word_count": 187
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:54:19.408476+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "GEORGE JAMES v. L. J. BAKER."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee OueiaM.\nTbe exceptions debated before us, and wbicb are brought forward in plaintiff\u2019s brief, deal principally with tbe charge of tbe court on tbe subject of constructive and adverse possession. After a careful perusal of tbe record, as it relates to these exceptions, we are unable to discover any error. Tbe case seems to have been tried in substantial conformity to our decisions on tbe subject, and we have found no sufficient reason for disturbing tbe result of tbe trial.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee OueiaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Boswell C. Bridger and S. Brown Shepherd for plaintiff.",
      "A. Paul Kitchin, Stuart Smith, and Daniel & Daniel for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "GEORGE JAMES v. L. J. BAKER.\n(Filed 20 September, 1922.)\nEjectment \u2014 Instructions\u2014Appeal and Error.\nUpon tbe trial of this action in ejectment and for damages, the charge of the court upon the principles of constructive and adverse possession are held to be without error.\nAppeal by-plaintiff from Calvert, J., at November Term, 1921, of Halifax.\nEjectment, and to recover damages for an alleged trespass.\n\u2022 Upon denial of tbe plaintiff\u2019s title and claim, there was a verdict and judgment in favor of defendant. Plaintiff appealed.\nBoswell C. Bridger and S. Brown Shepherd for plaintiff.\nA. Paul Kitchin, Stuart Smith, and Daniel & Daniel for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0612-01",
  "first_page_order": 668,
  "last_page_order": 668
}