{
  "id": 11271800,
  "name": "HENRY VANN v. J. B. WINDERS",
  "name_abbreviation": "Vann v. Winders",
  "decision_date": "1922-10-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "629",
  "last_page": "630",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "184 N.C. 629"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "90 N. C., 7",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8683793
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/90/0007-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 127,
    "char_count": 1428,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.446,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.239133825948926
    },
    "sha256": "0d7f26f7466a80eccec009aa0d053c89c653aa0a976767e60f9f30a7f3c54602",
    "simhash": "1:16293685af137243",
    "word_count": 232
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:54:19.408476+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "HENRY VANN v. J. B. WINDERS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cubiam.\nThis was a proceeding under C. S., 740, in which the judgment debtor, defendant herein, being dissatisfied with the valuation and allotment of his homestead and personal property exemptions, as assessed by the appraisers in an execution, undertook to have the same set aside and vacated for alleged irregularities in the returns.\nIt is stated in the record that \u201cafter a hearing, the defendant\u2019s exceptions were overruled, defendant excepted and appealed,\u201d but there was no order or judgment signed by the judge; at least, none appears on the record. The record seems to be incomplete. Logan v. Harris, 90 N. C., 7. However, we have examined the defendant\u2019s exceptions and find them to be without merit. No error has been shown.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cubiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Butler & Herring for plaintiff.",
      "John B. Kerr, Sr., for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "HENRY VANN v. J. B. WINDERS.\n(Filed 11 October, 1922.)\nAppeal and Error \u2014 Homestead\u2014Judgment\u2014Incomplete Appeal.\nOn this appeal from an allotment of a homestead by the judgment debtor, it appears that the record failed to show a signed judgment, and the appeal is incomplete.\nAppeal by defendant from Lyon, J., at February Term, 1922, of SAMPSON.\nExceptions to allotment of homestead and personal property exemptions filed by the defendant before the- clerk of the Superior Court and transferred by bim to the civil issue docket.\nFrom a judgment overruling the defendant\u2019s exceptions, this appeal is prosecuted.\nButler & Herring for plaintiff.\nJohn B. Kerr, Sr., for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0629-01",
  "first_page_order": 685,
  "last_page_order": 686
}