{
  "id": 11271824,
  "name": "DAVIS BROTHERS CHEESE COMPANY v. J. H. CULBRETH et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Davis Bros. Cheese Co. v. Culbreth",
  "decision_date": "1922-11-15",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "631",
  "last_page": "631",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "184 N.C. 631"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 101,
    "char_count": 976,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.438,
    "sha256": "c4b83e078befa65f12acfb76395ee7d49e0d8e56ef5c39962174ddfbf867d95c",
    "simhash": "1:9e9b18ea437cc030",
    "word_count": 157
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:54:19.408476+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "DAVIS BROTHERS CHEESE COMPANY v. J. H. CULBRETH et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee OueiaM.\nTbe controversy, on trial, narrowed itself to questions of fact, wbicb bave been settled by tbe verdict. After a careful perusal of tbe record, we are convinced tbat tbe case bas been tried in substantial conformity to tbe law as bearing on tbe subject, and we bave found no sufficient reason for disturbing tbe result below.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee OueiaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Cooh & Cooh for plaintiff.",
      "Oates ,& Herring for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "DAVIS BROTHERS CHEESE COMPANY v. J. H. CULBRETH et al.\n(Filed 15 November, 1922.)\nVerdict \u2014 Issues of Fact \u2014 Appeal and Error.\nAppeal by defendants from Cownor, J., at February Term, 1922, of CumbeRlaNB.\nCivil action in assumpsit, tried upon tbe following issues :\n\u201c1. Did plaintiff deliver to tbe defendants 50 boxes of cbeese, in accordance witb defendants\u2019 order? Answer: 'Yes.\u2019\n\u201c2. In wbat sum, if any, are defendants indebted to plaintiff? Answer : \u2018$323.64, and interest.\u2019 \u201d\nJudgment on tbe verdict in favor of tbe plaintiff, from wbicb tbe defendants appealed.\nCooh & Cooh for plaintiff.\nOates ,& Herring for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0631-01",
  "first_page_order": 687,
  "last_page_order": 687
}