{
  "id": 11271832,
  "name": "TILDA COMBS et al. v. SMETHPORT EXTRACT COMPANY et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Combs v. Smethport Extract Co.",
  "decision_date": "1922-11-22",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "632",
  "last_page": "632",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "184 N.C. 632"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 118,
    "char_count": 1113,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.451,
    "sha256": "a8d565109abfa0992b2adcf75a17f1eadf471f5e431a6214b5c6886b4e8ffea2",
    "simhash": "1:e9528cb82b31d779",
    "word_count": 189
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:54:19.408476+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "TILDA COMBS et al. v. SMETHPORT EXTRACT COMPANY et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Ctjrlam.\nDefendants rely chiefly upon their exception taken to his Honor\u2019s refusal to grant defendants\u2019 motion for judgment as of non-suit, made first at the close of the plaintiff\u2019s evidence, and renewed at the close of all the evidence. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, the accepted position on a motion of this kind, we think his Honor was justified in submitting the case to the jury, and that the verdict is amply supported by the evidence.\nAfter a careful perusal of the record, we have discovered no sufficient reason for disturbing the result of the trial.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Ctjrlam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles B. Spicer for plaintiffs.",
      "B. A. Doughton and T. C. Bowie for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "TILDA COMBS et al. v. SMETHPORT EXTRACT COMPANY et al.\n(Filed 22 November, 1922.)\nEvidence \u2014 N onsuit \u2014 Trials.\nAppeal by defendants from Harding, J., at April Term, 1922, of Ashe.\nCivil action for trespass, and to remove cloud from title.\nBoth, parties claimed title to the locus in quo; and, upon the traverse and issues thus joined, there was a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. Defendants appealed.\nCharles B. Spicer for plaintiffs.\nB. A. Doughton and T. C. Bowie for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0632-01",
  "first_page_order": 688,
  "last_page_order": 688
}