{
  "id": 8657142,
  "name": "N. C. McLEOD v. J. W. LEMONS",
  "name_abbreviation": "McLeod v. Lemons",
  "decision_date": "1923-05-26",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "610",
  "last_page": "611",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "185 N.C. 610"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "183 N. C., 438",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8656651
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/183/0438-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "184 N. C., 179",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11269625
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/184/0179-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 133,
    "char_count": 1430,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.461,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20766152775702368
    },
    "sha256": "7f13efb19b419867055df8962642f5f823b985e7d83e6feebdefc36182ceaf1c",
    "simhash": "1:7cedfacc3666932a",
    "word_count": 235
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:46:28.944101+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "N. C. McLEOD v. J. W. LEMONS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nIn a collision between plaintiff\u2019s buggy and defendant\u2019s automobile, plaintiff alleges that he was thrown to the ground and seriously injured. There was evidence tending to support the jury\u2019s finrL'-ng on the first and second issues; and we have found no reversible error committed on the trial.\nIt is well established that in an action like 'the present the contributory negligence of the plaintiff which proximately- produces the injury will bar a recovery. Construction Co. v. R. R., 184 N. C., 179; Moore v. Iron Works, 183 N. C., 438.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "G. A. Armstrong and J. A. Spence for plaintiff.",
      "B. T. Poole for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "N. C. McLEOD v. J. W. LEMONS.\n(Filed 26 May, 1923.)\nNegligence \u2014 Contributory Negligence \u2014 Proximate Cause.\nTire contributory negligence of the plaintiff in a personal injury case will bar his recovery if it proximately produces the injury for which damages are sought by him in his action.\nAppeal by plaintiff from Broch, J., at September Term, 1922, of MONTGOMERY.\nCivil action for damages, tried upon the following issues:\n\u201c1. Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: \u2018Yes.\u2019\n\u201c2. Did the plaintiff by his own negligence contribute to his injury, as alleged in the answer ? Answer: Wes.\u2019\n\u201c3. What damage, if any, is plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant? Answer: .\u201d\nJudgment on the verdict for defendant. Plaintiff appealed.\nG. A. Armstrong and J. A. Spence for plaintiff.\nB. T. Poole for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0610-01",
  "first_page_order": 676,
  "last_page_order": 677
}