{
  "id": 8654651,
  "name": "VIRGINIA-CAROLINA CHEMICAL COMPANY v. N. C. NEWBERN",
  "name_abbreviation": "Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Newbern",
  "decision_date": "1923-09-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "765",
  "last_page": "765",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "186 N.C. 765"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 52,
    "char_count": 381,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.479,
    "sha256": "8797a454f589d4ade3649e8cab4f3777261e5bf88b2fd61bb149009bc6a76161",
    "simhash": "1:08394a2b1daba1f3",
    "word_count": 60
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:10:30.005509+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "VIRGINIA-CAROLINA CHEMICAL COMPANY v. N. C. NEWBERN."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per CuriaM.\nWe have examined the record carefully in this case, and find no sufficient reason to disturb the verdict and the judgment.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per CuriaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Thompson & Wilson and W. A. Worth for plaintiff.",
      "Ehringhaus & Hall for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "VIRGINIA-CAROLINA CHEMICAL COMPANY v. N. C. NEWBERN.\n(Filed 12 September, 1923.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Connor, J., at April Term, 1923, of Cur-RITUCK.\nThompson & Wilson and W. A. Worth for plaintiff.\nEhringhaus & Hall for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0765-02",
  "first_page_order": 829,
  "last_page_order": 829
}