{
  "id": 8654682,
  "name": "W. R. DOWDY et al. v. W. H. JONES",
  "name_abbreviation": "Dowdy v. Jones",
  "decision_date": "1923-10-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "767",
  "last_page": "768",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "186 N.C. 767"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 124,
    "char_count": 1095,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.456,
    "sha256": "fd8fb14c724bbd5262f4c89bc4e16bd7667c00fe767ccc51de3ed1997647e67e",
    "simhash": "1:c96e612977153df8",
    "word_count": 193
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:10:30.005509+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "W. R. DOWDY et al. v. W. H. JONES."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee OueiaM.\nThe trial of tbis cause reduced itself to a controversy over issues of fact, which the jury alone could determine. A careful perusal of the record convinces us that the case has been tried substantially in accordance with the law bearing on the subject, and we have discovered no ruling or action on the part of the trial court which would seem to require another hearing. The chief exceptions are those directed to alleged errors in the charge and to the court\u2019s refusal to grant the defendant\u2019s motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit. There is nothing on the record which entitles the defendant to a new trial or to a dismissal.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee OueiaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "D. L. Ward and F. G. Brinson for plaintiffs.",
      "Ward & Ward for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "W. R. DOWDY et al. v. W. H. JONES.\n(Filed 10 October, 1923.)\nAppeal by defendant from Grady, J., at April Term, 1923, of Pamlico.\nCivil action in ejectment and to recover rents. Defendant denied plaintiffs\u2019 title and set up claim to the land. Upon the issues thus joined, there was a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiffs. Defendant appealed, assigning errors.\nD. L. Ward and F. G. Brinson for plaintiffs.\nWard & Ward for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0767-01",
  "first_page_order": 831,
  "last_page_order": 832
}